I’ve been reading David Foster Wallace’s non-fiction lately because whenever I want to read a good piece of writing for inspiration, I find his work to be the most helpful. One of the great things about his essays is that he spends a lot of time and admirable energy figuring out what makes writing good and what makes it not good and how writers can use the English language to best do their jobs. His quest to explain this is a highly cerebral, tiring slog, but one that I find myself wish more people writing things on the internet would spend time with.
DFW tells us repeatedly that essays are for the reader. He argues that it is not the reader’s job to figure out why she should be reading a certain writer’s work, but the writer’s job to show the reader why she should be spending her valuable time reading what a writer has to say. Essays, he explains, are not to serve the writer, but the reader. And this is something that I find a lot of internet writers either forgetting or completely oblivious to.

